How to calculate the return on your solar electric system before you buy.
For years, questions about returns on the expensive investment in a solar electric system were dismissed with the analogy, "What's the payback on your swimming
pool?" That sentiment might speak to the converted, but for most people considering a solar energy system, the financial case is a major deciding factor.
photovoltaic (PV) technology has matured such that the payback question
can now be given a serious answer, backed by solid math and accounting.
The answers vary significantly by local climate, utility rates and
incentives. In the best cases - California and New Jersey - the compound
annual rate of return is well over 10 percent, the cash flow is positive,
and the increase in property resale value more than covers the cost
of the PV system. In other parts of the country where electric rates
are low and incentives. may be less, a grid-tied system may barely
cover its maintenance costs.
This article focuses on residential analyses. Similar calculations can be done for commercial situations, but significant differences in the tax and accounting rules exist. See the resources mentioned at the end of this article to learn more about commercial analyses.
What Factors Improve Payback?
The most important factors for making solar an attractive investment include high electric rates, financial incentives,
net metering policies and good sunlight (available in almost all of the continental United States).
High electric rates can come in various ways. California,
Hawaii, New York and other states have average rates well above $0.15
per kilowatt-hour. California has a tiered pricing system penalizing
large residential users with prices as high as $0.33 per kilowatt-hour.
Under most net-metering laws (they vary by state or utility), solar energy offsets the retail cost of the electricity generated. Even better, in California, solar systems are allowed to operate on a time
of use rate schedule, which enables users to sell back electricity to the utility at peak rates, which can be even more valuable. These high rates are the most important factor in improving the payback.
Direct incentives can include tax benefits such as credits or depreciation. The most celebrated recent incentive is the federal tax credit for solar systems that went into effect Jan. 1. The credit is for 30 percent of the system cost up to $2,000 for residential systems (no cap on commercial credits). For PV systems, that typically means a $2,000 credit on the purchaser's tax return for the year the system was installed. This credit can be coupled with state incentives. Another popular state incentive is the rebate, which can discount up to 60 percent of a system's cost.
Some states also have a state tax credit, which can further reduce the up-front cost of a system. Consult a certified tax advisor to check the applicability of such incentives to your situation.
A big factor in some calculations is inflation in electric rates. Solar is an inflation-protected investment, because it offsets electricity costs at the current prevailing retail rate. As rates rise, the owner saves even more.
New forms of incentive,
including RECs (renewable energy credits, or "green tags"),
combined with net metering and other incentives. With these, a PV
system is capable of garnering substantial revenue per kilowatt-hour
Determining the Payback
There are several ways
to measure the economic value of a solar system: compound annual rate
of return, cash flow
and increase in property resale value.
economic cases, the returns will be over 10 percent, the cash flow
positive and the increase in resale value greater than system cost.
These are common returns in certain markets.
Compound annual rate of return, or CARR, on an investment is another term for interest-rate yield, which is a way of comparing one investment to another. For example, a savings account might pay 1 percent interest and the
long term stock market has paid about 10.5 percent. Solar systems in California, New Jersey and a few other locations can often see a pre-tax CARR of 10 percent or more.
The cash flow will be positive, either immediately or within the first few years, for many homeowners who finance their solar systems using home equity loans.
The cash-flow calculation compares the estimated savings on the electric bill to the cost of the loan. Monthly loan cost is the principal plus interest payment required to payoff the loan, less any tax savings. In the case of "deductible" loans, such as home
equity based loans, the interest is usually tax deductible and thus the loan effectively costs less. Home equity loans are also excellent sources of funds because interest rates on real
estate secured loans are relatively low and payment terms can be long.
Inflation plays an important part. Inflation affects electric rates and thus effectively increases the savings from a solar system over time. Inflation doesn't affect loan rates, particularly with fixed-rate loans.
Hence, as electric rates rise, the savings grows, but the cost of the loan stays relatively constant (it rises a little over time as the interest portion of the payment declines and the tax deductibility declines).
The accumulation of net annual savings is free and clear with no initial outlay of cash, because that was covered by the loan. The savings are small though significant in the first years, but really jump when the loan payments stop.
Increase in Property Resale Value
occurs in homes with solar electric
systems because these systems decrease utility operating costs. According
to a 1998 Appraisal journal
article by Rick Nevin and Gregory Watson,
a home's value increases $20,000 for every $1,000 reduction in annual
operating costs from energy efficiency.
The rationale is that the money from the reduction in operating costs can be spent on a larger mortgage with no net change in monthly cost of ownership. Nevin and Watson state that historic mortgage costs have an
after tax effective interest rate of about 5 percent. If $1,000 of reduced operating costs is put toward debt service at 5 percent, it can support an additional $20,000 of debt. To the borrower, total monthly cost of home ownership is identical. Instead of paying the utility, the homeowner pays the bank, but the total cost is unchanged.
increase can effectively reduce the payback period to zero years if
the owner chose to sell the property immediately, and it removes the
purchase risk. It could even lead to a profit on resale in some cases.
This increase in property value to date is currently theoretical. A high fraction of the grid-tied solar electric systems have been installed since 2001. Most of these homes have not been sold, so there are no broad studies of comparable resale values available. However, emerging evidence suggests that some solar home sellers are realizing significant jumps in resale value.
A 2004 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) study demonstrated
that San Diego zero-energy homes with solar features increased in
value faster than comparable conventional homes in a nearby community.
the homes increased in value $40,000 more than the conventional homes,
at a higher rate of appreciation and with a shorter length of ownership.
PV systems will appreciate over time, rather than depreciate as they age. The appreciation comes from the increasing annual
savings the system will yield as electric rates and bill savings rise.
This appreciation cannot continue forever, as the increase in resale value runs into the second limit, which relates to the system's remaining life. For these analyses, the system is assumed to be worthless at the end of 25 years. This estimate is conservative, since the panels are warranted at 25 years to work at 80 percent of their new capability. If the system is worthless at the end of 25 years, the only value the system has as it nears that time are the savings it can generate before the end of the 25th year. Both the increasing property resale value due to increasing annual savings and the
remaining value limitation that takes over at approximately year 11. As the NREL resale study suggests, however, actual resale could be much higher depending on the market mood for solar.
Creating Markets That Reward Investment
For more information on calculating photovoltaic system payback, access
www.ongrid.net/papers. Be aware that some tools don't account for tiered or time-of-use electric rates in
interaction with PV production, and as such, their results may over or underestimate the value of a PV system in a particular situation.
In addition to avoiding oversimplified estimates, be cautious of aggressive sales pitches and "optimistic" financial analyses. Going solar, like any other major purchase, is a "buyer beware" situation.
Solar has finally come into its own in certain markets. These markets are exploding because individuals are discovering the financial benefits of owning PV systems in those regions. In order to encourage widespread adoption of solar energy, we need to empower everyone with this knowledge and expand the components that make it possible - tiered rates, time-of-use net metering, RPSs with solar requirements and RECs. Market forces will take it from there. .
.seia.org/man ualdown load. ph p